Issue raised by Helen on Corruption of Nostradamus texts

Issue raised by Helen on Corruption of Nostradamus texts 23/6/2013:

"Allan - I am afraid to say that everyone, including Erika Cheetham "played" with the words
and I have found that this has been VERY harmful to the intent."

Response:

Helen,
This is not a problem for my work. It is essential I test only one potential source. If it is corrupt then what is the chance they will have changed it to make it generate MORE English anagrams than Nostradamus might have included in his handwritten manuscript when no one else has ever  proposed it as a solution? The answer is no chance at all.

If I am free to choose which text I can take my solutions from then there would be a serious credibility question hanging over my work.

When all my rules are taken into account (see my website for these) the results I produce eliminate the problems you are describing. If you look at the anagram report for American on my Report Blog you will see how strong my case is.

I know that from your point of view it does matter because your focus is mainly on what he said while mine is on showing the coding method but if I had a different text transposed into a computer readable format I could produce solutions within a day by my current methods.

Allan